← News & Updates

Technical Guides

ISO 16890 Explained: ePM1, ePM2.5 and ePM10 vs F7, F8 and MERV

2026-09-27

ISO 16890 replaced EN 779 and rates filters by how much of each particulate-matter fraction they remove. This guide explains the groups and how they roughly compare with F-classes and MERV.

Key points

  • ISO 16890 replaced EN 779 (G/M/F classes) in 2018.
  • Filters are grouped as ISO ePM1, ePM2.5, ePM10 or ISO Coarse by the fraction they remove.
  • The ePM1 and ePM2.5 groups require the efficiency to hold after electrostatic discharge.
  • There is no official conversion to F-classes or MERV — only approximate guidance.

Why a new standard

EN 779 rated medium-efficiency filters with a single 0.4 µm test particle and G, M and F classes. ISO 16890 instead measures efficiency across particle sizes and reports it against the size fractions used in air-quality regulation — PM1, PM2.5 and PM10. The result says directly how much fine dust a filter removes from the air people breathe.

The four groups

ISO 16890 groups
GroupRequirementReported as
ISO ePM1≥ 50% efficiency for PM1, including after dischargee.g. ISO ePM1 60%
ISO ePM2.5≥ 50% efficiency for PM2.5, including after dischargee.g. ISO ePM2.5 70%
ISO ePM10≥ 50% efficiency for PM10e.g. ISO ePM10 55%
ISO Coarse< 50% for PM10; rated by gravimetric arrestancee.g. ISO Coarse 60%

Efficiencies are reported in 5% steps and a filter is classified in the highest group it qualifies for.

Why discharge testing matters

Many synthetic media carry an electrostatic charge that boosts initial efficiency but fades in service. ISO 16890 discharges a media sample and counts the lower result for the ePM1 and ePM2.5 groups. That rewards media whose efficiency is stable — one reason glass-fibre pocket filters and synthetic filters of the same nominal grade can be classified differently.

Approximate comparison with F-classes and MERV

Indicative only — no official conversion exists
EN 779 (old)Typical ISO 16890 resultApprox. MERV
G4ISO Coarse 60–90%MERV 7–8
M5ISO ePM10 50–60%MERV 9–10
M6ISO ePM2.5 50–65%MERV 11–12
F7ISO ePM1 50–65%MERV 13
F8ISO ePM1 65–80%MERV 14
F9ISO ePM1 > 80%MERV 15–16

Actual results depend on the media; always compare filters by their tested ISO 16890 report. Our older catalogue grades use ASHRAE 52.1 dust-spot efficiency with MERV equivalents.

How to specify

  • Pre-HEPA stage in cleanroom systems: typically ISO ePM1 filters (the former F7–F9 range).
  • Office and commercial supply air: ISO ePM1 50–70% or ePM2.5, depending on outdoor air quality.
  • First stage and outdoor-air intakes: ISO Coarse or ePM10.
  • State the ISO group and percentage in your enquiry, e.g. 'ISO ePM1 65%, 592 × 592 × 600 mm, 6 pockets'.

Frequently asked questions

Is F7 the same as ePM1 50%?

Roughly — many F7 filters test in the ISO ePM1 50–65% range — but there is no official equivalence. Compare tested ISO 16890 results.

Does ISO 16890 apply to HEPA filters?

No. HEPA and ULPA filters are classified under EN 1822 / ISO 29463.

Why did my synthetic filter get a lower ISO rating than its old F-class?

ISO 16890 counts efficiency after electrostatic discharge for the ePM1 and ePM2.5 groups, so media that relied on charge can classify lower.

← All newsDiscuss your project with Yiding ↗